X-Original-To: pgsql-interfaces-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.2]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59B53D1D132 for ; Tue, 17 Feb 2004 09:09:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 73970-01 for ; Tue, 17 Feb 2004 05:09:39 -0400 (AST) Received: from web40601.mail.yahoo.com (web40601.mail.yahoo.com [66.218.78.138]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D46DFD1B511 for ; Tue, 17 Feb 2004 05:09:36 -0400 (AST) Message-ID: <20040217090938.22092.qmail@web40601.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [135.214.42.162] by web40601.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 17 Feb 2004 01:09:38 PST Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 01:09:38 -0800 (PST) From: Brett Schwarz Subject: Re: Need new project admin for unbundled Tcl interface To: "Marc G. Fournier" , L J Bayuk Cc: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org In-Reply-To: <20040216110520.A96890@ganymede.hub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org X-Archive-Number: 200402/42 X-Sequence-Number: 4735 --- "Marc G. Fournier" wrote: > On Sun, 15 Feb 2004, L J Bayuk wrote: > > > Brett, I started with pgtcl-1.4b3 from Gborg, plus > the changes Karl put > > into CVS in January 2003. I merged in changes from > the PostgreSQL-7.4.1 > > libpgtcl (core), then made enough changes of my > own that the diffs to > > either Gborg or -core versions are now quite > substantial. I appreciate the > > offer to join your project, but would you even > accept such a huge chunk of > > changes in one update? Would you have time to > review it? Would it sit in > > CVS indefinitely? > > Ummmm, if you were to join the project, I was under > the impression it > would have been with CVS privileges ... Brett? > Yes, that's true. I have no problems with people joining the project (and I think Karl agrees with this as well), I just don't understand why it has to be all or nothing. In fact, I just added someone a few weeks ago so they could commit some changes. > > to do so. I know the goal was to remove libpgtcl > from -core; is the PG > > Group satisfied with the progress of the Gborg > pgtcl project toward this > > goal? > > So far, the only thing I've seen from Brett was an > offer to give you > commit privileges to the GBorg tree so that you > could commit updates ... > Brett, did I mis-understand your note? You understood it correctly. regards, --brett __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Finance: Get your refund fast by filing online. http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html