X-Original-To: pgsql-interfaces-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.2]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6875D1D25D for ; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 03:19:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 44992-07 for ; Tue, 17 Feb 2004 23:19:03 -0400 (AST) Received: from ganymede.hub.org (u46n208.hfx.eastlink.ca [24.222.46.208]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93957D1B49E for ; Tue, 17 Feb 2004 23:18:59 -0400 (AST) Received: by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 94F2335524; Tue, 17 Feb 2004 23:13:57 -0400 (AST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91E7534FFA; Tue, 17 Feb 2004 23:13:57 -0400 (AST) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 23:13:57 -0400 (AST) From: "Marc G. Fournier" X-X-Sender: scrappy@ganymede.hub.org To: L J Bayuk Cc: Bruce Momjian , Brett Schwarz , pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Need new project admin for unbundled Tcl interface In-Reply-To: <200402180255.i1I2t6ro000547@mindspring.com> Message-ID: <20040217230736.Q793@ganymede.hub.org> References: <200402180255.i1I2t6ro000547@mindspring.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org X-Archive-Number: 200402/51 X-Sequence-Number: 4744 On Tue, 17 Feb 2004, L J Bayuk wrote: > I offered to take over the Gborg pgtcl project because I thought nobody > wanted it. It seemed stalled, having made no releases since beta3 in > November 2002, no CVS updates since January 2003, and no progress on the > reference manual. I assumed the project admins had moved on to other > things and would be glad to turn it over. > > The response I got was no, they don't want to give it up, but I could > join and get CVS commit rights. Not good enough, unless there are going > to be releases. I'm not hearing that there will be releases. If there have been no commits to the gborg version in almost a year, what would a new release be based off of? What I'm really curious of is why the patches to -core didn't get into gborg ... IMHO, the current gborg seems to have gone 'stale' :( > I really don't want to antagonize anyone, but I think a project fork is > in order. I'll put my version into a new project, and we'll see what > happens. Well, that works too ... since I know the gborg version is not in sync with the -core version, and since I think that bringing gborg in sync with -core would be confusing at best ... if you can create the project, I can copy the current CVS files (with history) from -core to gborg ... I really don't want to lose the changes/history over the past year ... ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664