X-Original-To: pgsql-interfaces-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.2]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AB59D1D69B; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 02:57:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 43834-07; Tue, 17 Feb 2004 22:57:51 -0400 (AST) Received: from blount.mail.mindspring.net (blount.mail.mindspring.net [207.69.200.226]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E029CD1D501; Tue, 17 Feb 2004 22:57:46 -0400 (AST) Received: from sdn-ap-001njpennp0447.dialsprint.net ([63.185.129.193] helo=mindspring.com) by blount.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1AtHuD-00065W-00; Tue, 17 Feb 2004 21:57:46 -0500 Received: (from lbayuk@localhost) by mindspring.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) id i1I2t6ro000547; Tue, 17 Feb 2004 21:55:06 -0500 From: L J Bayuk Message-Id: <200402180255.i1I2t6ro000547@mindspring.com> Subject: Re: Need new project admin for unbundled Tcl interface To: scrappy@postgresql.org (Marc G. Fournier) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 21:55:06 -0500 (EST) Cc: pgman@candle.pha.pa.us (Bruce Momjian), brett_schwarz@yahoo.com (Brett Schwarz), pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org In-Reply-To: <20040217123451.P94474@ganymede.hub.org> from "Marc G. Fournier" at Feb 17, 2004 12:35:43 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org X-Archive-Number: 200402/50 X-Sequence-Number: 4743 Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > On Tue, 17 Feb 2004, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > > > > > The issue right now is that the -core and gborg versions are no longer in > > > sync ... we're working on correcting that ... > > > > He seemed to be saying that he wanted all or nothing, but I couldn't > > figure out what "all" was. Glad it is moving forward, so I don't need > > to understand the issue. :-) > > No, the way I understood it is that LJ got the impression that Brett > wasn't willing to provide commit access to the CVS, so any patches that LJ > submitted would hav to go through a review process, etc ... > > At least that's what *I* thought hte issue is/was and am working based on > that :) Sorry, no. Let's start over. I offered to take over the Gborg pgtcl project because I thought nobody wanted it. It seemed stalled, having made no releases since beta3 in November 2002, no CVS updates since January 2003, and no progress on the reference manual. I assumed the project admins had moved on to other things and would be glad to turn it over. The response I got was no, they don't want to give it up, but I could join and get CVS commit rights. Not good enough, unless there are going to be releases. I'm not hearing that there will be releases. I need this interface working, and I don't want a beta- or CVS- version. I also want documentation, and I want binaries for Windows. I think the -core developers want that too, so they can be free of the core version. So what's the holdup? (No, it isn't that "the -core and gborg versions are no longer in sync" - that's a symptom, not the cause - and is someone really working on that?) I really don't want to antagonize anyone, but I think a project fork is in order. I'll put my version into a new project, and we'll see what happens.