X-Original-To: pgsql-interfaces-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.2]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD533D1DD86; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 03:57:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 65047-01; Tue, 17 Feb 2004 23:57:46 -0400 (AST) Received: from candle.pha.pa.us (candle.pha.pa.us [207.106.42.251]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F37EED1DC6F; Tue, 17 Feb 2004 23:57:35 -0400 (AST) Received: (from pgman@localhost) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.11.6) id i1I3vZK02711; Tue, 17 Feb 2004 22:57:35 -0500 (EST) From: Bruce Momjian Message-Id: <200402180357.i1I3vZK02711@candle.pha.pa.us> Subject: Re: Need new project admin for unbundled Tcl interface In-Reply-To: <20040217230736.Q793@ganymede.hub.org> To: "Marc G. Fournier" Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 22:57:35 -0500 (EST) Cc: L J Bayuk , Brett Schwarz , pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL108 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org X-Archive-Number: 200402/52 X-Sequence-Number: 4745 Marc G. Fournier wrote: > On Tue, 17 Feb 2004, L J Bayuk wrote: > > > I offered to take over the Gborg pgtcl project because I thought nobody > > wanted it. It seemed stalled, having made no releases since beta3 in > > November 2002, no CVS updates since January 2003, and no progress on the > > reference manual. I assumed the project admins had moved on to other > > things and would be glad to turn it over. > > > > The response I got was no, they don't want to give it up, but I could > > join and get CVS commit rights. Not good enough, unless there are going > > to be releases. I'm not hearing that there will be releases. > > If there have been no commits to the gborg version in almost a year, what > would a new release be based off of? What I'm really curious of is why > the patches to -core didn't get into gborg ... IMHO, the current gborg > seems to have gone 'stale' :( > > > I really don't want to antagonize anyone, but I think a project fork is > > in order. I'll put my version into a new project, and we'll see what > > happens. > > Well, that works too ... since I know the gborg version is not in sync > with the -core version, and since I think that bringing gborg in sync with > -core would be confusing at best ... if you can create the project, I can Why confusing? Add core changes to gborg, remove the core version, and submit patches to improve the gborg version. > copy the current CVS files (with history) from -core to gborg ... I really > don't want to lose the changes/history over the past year ... If you submit changes, there will be a release and it will start to move. Making a new project just so it is new really isn't going to add much. As for why the core changes didn't make it into gborg, few realized there was a gborg version because there was still a version in core CVS. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073