From: L J Bayuk <ljb220@mindspring.com>
Message-Id: <200402210042.i1L0guIx000290@mindspring.com>
Subject: Re: Need new project admin for unbundled Tcl interface
To: cmaj@freedomcorpse.info (C. Maj)
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 19:42:56 -0500 (EST)
Cc: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.56.0402191934210.6455@screw> from "C. Maj" at Feb 19,
	2004 07:57:29 PM
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

C. Maj wrote:
> ...
> 
> Besides this thread being half-on and half-off the
> interfaces list, I think the only *problem* is that libpgtcl
> never got removed from the core.  If libpgtcl were only a
> gborg project, then maybe this wouldn't be such a mess.
> Instead, it is a mess, because people were getting upset that
> two forks of libpgtcl (gborg and core) were not kept in sync.
> 
> Now they are sync'd, so why make a third fork ?  Destroy the
> core libpgtcl and apply the patch to the gborg version.

I had no idea they were sync'd. Look at that - all those CVS commits on the
Gborg pgtcl project in the last 48 hours or so. After a year of nothing.
Perhaps it was discussed in the "half-off" part of the thread.  Well, this
is an interesting development. I wonder what will happen next.