X-Original-To: pgsql-interfaces-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.2])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 5462CD1DACE; Fri,  9 Apr 2004 21:34:26 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 03419-07; Fri,  9 Apr 2004 21:34:27 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from barry.mail.mindspring.net (barry.mail.mindspring.net
	[207.69.200.25]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id B5464D1DAB9; Fri,  9 Apr 2004 21:34:23 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from sdn-ap-008njpennp0270.dialsprint.net ([63.185.201.16]
	helo=mindspring.com)
	by barry.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1)
	id 1BC6Rv-0004nO-00; Fri, 09 Apr 2004 20:34:20 -0400
Received: (from lbayuk@localhost)
	by mindspring.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) id i3A0Mrp6000254;
	Fri, 9 Apr 2004 20:22:54 -0400
From: L J Bayuk <ljb220@mindspring.com>
Message-Id: <200404100022.i3A0Mrp6000254@mindspring.com>
Subject: Re: Why is libpgtcl still in CVS?
To: pgman@candle.pha.pa.us (Bruce Momjian)
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2004 20:22:53 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org (PostgreSQL-development),
	pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org (PostgreSQL-interfaces)
In-Reply-To: <200404091739.i39HdH826311@candle.pha.pa.us> from "Bruce Momjian"
	at Apr 09, 2004 01:39:17 PM
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org
X-Archive-Number: 200404/20
X-Sequence-Number: 4841

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> 
> Why is libpgtcl still in /src/interfaces?  Isn't it now on gborg?  Are
> there two of them there now?

There are indeed two - mine and the other one:
  http://gborg.postgresql.org/project/pgtclng/
     Version 1.5.0 released 2004-02-29 (source, manual, and Windows binary
     releases)
  http://gborg.postgresql.org/project/pgtcl/
     Last release was beta 1.4b3 2002-11-15?

If you delete libpgtcl from "core" CVS, you lose the histories. I don't
think you want that. But that doesn't mean you necessarily have to bundle
it with the release anymore, does it? It's up to you core team people what
you want to do about unbundling libpgtcl. I've done my part. But I do have
a suggestion: if you chose to unbundled it and pgtclng becomes the
"official" Tcl interface, someone from the core team needs to be added to
the admin list of the gborg pgtclng project. You know, just in case...