X-Original-To: pgsql-interfaces-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.2]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2881D1DACB for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 17:02:35 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 82855-07 for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 17:02:34 -0300 (ADT) Received: from web40612.mail.yahoo.com (web40612.mail.yahoo.com [66.218.78.149]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 698AFD1D501 for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 17:02:31 -0300 (ADT) Message-ID: <20040419200232.37741.qmail@web40612.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [135.214.42.68] by web40612.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 13:02:32 PDT Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 13:02:32 -0700 (PDT) From: Brett Schwarz Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Why is libpgtcl still in CVS? To: PostgreSQL-interfaces Cc: PostgreSQL-development In-Reply-To: <200404191746.i3JHkcJ01511@candle.pha.pa.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org X-Archive-Number: 200404/31 X-Sequence-Number: 4852 for the second part, yes, there are 2 on gborg: pgtcl and pgtclng --- Bruce Momjian wrote: > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Why is libpgtcl still in /src/interfaces? Isn't > it now on gborg? Are > > there two of them there now? > > I am still waiting for an answer on this. Does no > one know? > > -- > Bruce Momjian | > http://candle.pha.pa.us > pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) > 359-1001 > + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts > Road > + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown > Square, Pennsylvania 19073 > > ---------------------------(end of > broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose > an index scan if your > joining column's datatypes do not match __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Photos: High-quality 4x6 digital prints for 25¢ http://photos.yahoo.com/ph/print_splash