X-Original-To: pgsql-interfaces-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.2])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 05C9BD1BA8F; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 18:09:30 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 12808-05; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 18:09:30 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from candle.pha.pa.us (candle.pha.pa.us [207.106.42.251])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 6E4BDD1B989; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 18:09:27 -0300 (ADT)
Received: (from pgman@localhost)
	by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.11.6) id i3JL9No11952;
	Mon, 19 Apr 2004 17:09:23 -0400 (EDT)
From: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Message-Id: <200404192109.i3JL9No11952@candle.pha.pa.us>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Why is libpgtcl still in CVS?
In-Reply-To: <20040419200232.37741.qmail@web40612.mail.yahoo.com>
To: Brett Schwarz <brett_schwarz@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 17:09:23 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: PostgreSQL-interfaces <pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org>,
	PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL108 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org
X-Archive-Number: 200404/32
X-Sequence-Number: 4853

Brett Schwarz wrote:
> for the second part, yes, there are 2 on gborg: pgtcl
> and pgtclng
> 
My question is whether they have all the CVS history and fixes in
libpgtcl so we can remove it from CVS.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073