X-Original-To: pgsql-interfaces-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.2]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFDF2D1B450 for ; Sat, 24 Apr 2004 23:45:17 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 99357-05 for ; Sat, 24 Apr 2004 23:45:20 -0300 (ADT) Received: from curie.credativ.org (credativ.com [217.160.209.18]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F55ED1B459 for ; Sat, 24 Apr 2004 23:45:16 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by curie.credativ.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0592955EFA; Sun, 25 Apr 2004 04:45:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from colt.pezone.net (dsl-082-082-234-094.arcor-ip.net [82.82.234.94]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by curie.credativ.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E98855EF7; Sun, 25 Apr 2004 04:45:19 +0200 (CEST) From: Peter Eisentraut To: "brian plummer" , pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org Subject: Re: I hope I'm missing something... Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2004 04:45:17 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.1 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200404250445.17972.peter_e@gmx.net> X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS at credativ.com X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200404/60 X-Sequence-Number: 4881 brian plummer wrote: > I've just spent some time looking at the libpq API and it appears > that I cannot process the actual field data from a select statement > in the native type of that field. Is this correct? Yes. You are more likely to be happy with ECPG or ODBC, which provide that functionality.