X-Original-To: pgsql-interfaces-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E776D1B1C8 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 10:48:16 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 69568-09 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 13:48:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wolff.to (wolff.to [66.93.249.74]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 836ACD1B19C for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 10:48:10 -0300 (ADT) Received: (qmail 14052 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2004 13:54:50 -0000 Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 08:54:50 -0500 From: Bruno Wolff III To: Paul Tilles Cc: interfaces Subject: Re: how to execute a function directly Message-ID: <20040630135450.GB13891@wolff.to> Mail-Followup-To: Paul Tilles , interfaces References: <40E2BA4D.18C25CC0@noaa.gov> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <40E2BA4D.18C25CC0@noaa.gov> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200406/76 X-Sequence-Number: 5004 On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 09:04:13 -0400, Paul Tilles wrote: > > I was wondering if there is a more generic way to cause a function to be > executed. I think you should consider using SELECT as the generic way to call functions in Postgres.