X-Original-To: pgsql-interfaces-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0F75529C0
	for <pgsql-interfaces-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Wed, 10 Aug 2005 18:05:33 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 72273-06
	for <pgsql-interfaces-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Wed, 10 Aug 2005 21:05:23 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from smtp.duo-county.com (smtp.duo-county.com [66.38.0.221])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27EBF52984
	for <pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org>;
	Wed, 10 Aug 2005 18:05:21 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (59-123.mod.duo-county.com
 [66.38.59.123])
	by bn9.blue.net (8.12.10/8.12.10/SMTP) with ESMTP id j7AL5EHG012881;
	Wed, 10 Aug 2005 16:05:14 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from dlb by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.50)
	id 1E2x5a-0000Xz-Mx; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 15:22:14 -0500
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 15:22:14 -0500
To: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
Cc: Sean Davis <sdavis2@mail.nih.gov>, David <dbree@duo-county.com>,
	pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: pgperl vs dbd-perl
Message-ID: <20050810202214.GA1935@localhost.localdomain>
Mail-Followup-To: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>,
	Sean Davis <sdavis2@mail.nih.gov>, David <dbree@duo-county.com>,
	pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
References: <BF1E3CA5.C038%sdavis2@mail.nih.gov>
	<42F9744D.5000408@commandprompt.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <42F9744D.5000408@commandprompt.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
From: David <dbree@duo-county.com>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL,
	FORGED_RCVD_HELO
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 200508/18
X-Sequence-Number: 5689

On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 08:28:13PM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:

> >>Is PgPerl still viable or is DBD the way to go?

> >DBD::Pg is the way to go, for numerous reasons.  DBI is very well 
> >supported.

> DBI/DBD is also what Perl considers standard.
> 
> Sincerely,
> 
> Joshua D. Drake

Well, it's still unanimous, and coming from people who have my respect.

Spent yesterday reading the DBD::Pg mailing list.  Now plan on studying
the manpages for DBD and for DBI.  It shouldn't be much of a chore
rewriting what little I've done so far into DBI code.

Thanks again to everyone who replied.  Maybe I've already said it, but I
thought I was seeing just what all of you have said, but just wasn't
sure.