Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 02:15:13 +0100
From: Ludek Finstrle <luf@pzkagis.cz>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Cc: pgsql-odbc@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: BLOB handling compatibility with PostgreSQL > 7.4
Message-ID: <20051209011513.GA8293@soptik.pzkagis.cz>
References: <438B792D.6030802@bnl.gov> <200512081055.12263.peter_e@gmx.net>
	<871x0nr8p0.fsf@meije.emic.fr> <200512081911.30002.peter_e@gmx.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200512081911.30002.peter_e@gmx.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i

Hello

> > As far as i know, the implementation of bytea and large objects in
> > the database are totally different and I suspect there are good
> > reasons to use either one of them, depending on the actual data and
> > application involved.
> 
> There is no real reason to use large objects for anything instead of 
> bytea.

There is a reason when you have already written application.
I don't use lo. I'm new in development of psqlODBC and one request
was: lo changed between 7.3 and 7.4
I try to solve it. You can find it in pgsql-odbc archive. It has
same subject.

I'm sorry I didn't read FAQ for psqlODBC earlier.

Regards,

Luf