X-Original-To: pgsql-odbc-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DC039DCAB7 for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2005 07:30:46 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 54232-09 for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2005 07:30:48 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.21]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4D4229DCABA for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2005 07:30:42 -0400 (AST) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 09 Dec 2005 11:08:51 -0000 Received: from dslb-084-063-017-061.pools.arcor-ip.net (EHLO colt.pezone.net) [84.63.17.61] by mail.gmx.net (mp010) with SMTP; 09 Dec 2005 12:08:51 +0100 X-Authenticated: #495269 From: Peter Eisentraut To: Ludek Finstrle Subject: Re: BLOB handling compatibility with PostgreSQL > 7.4 Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 12:08:44 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 Cc: pgsql-odbc@postgresql.org References: <438B792D.6030802@bnl.gov> <200512081911.30002.peter_e@gmx.net> <20051209011513.GA8293@soptik.pzkagis.cz> In-Reply-To: <20051209011513.GA8293@soptik.pzkagis.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200512091208.44967.peter_e@gmx.net> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.269 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.269] X-Spam-Score: 0.269 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200512/111 X-Sequence-Number: 6590 Ludek Finstrle wrote: > There is a reason when you have already written application. > I don't use lo. I'm new in development of psqlODBC and one request > was: lo changed between 7.3 and 7.4 I'm certainly not defending incompatible changes that break applications. I'm just wondering whether these problems can be avoided altogether in the future. -- Peter Eisentraut http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/