Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 11:35:42 -0500
From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@crankycanuck.ca>
To: pgsql-www@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: change to interfaces.html
Message-ID: <20071116163542.GL24718@crankycanuck.ca>
References: <20071115105151.79ff8061@scratch> <473C9D0A.1090409@hagander.net>
	<20071115112738.60c3a837@scratch>
	<9B276A8E7D64C7A3E5CFD1ED@ganymede.hub.org>
	<473D5A2A.9070904@postgresql.org>
	<C198CEF1186974C7C668719D@ganymede.hub.org>
	<473D6006.7080504@postgresql.org>
	<473DB9E9.3000006@commandprompt.com>
	<473DBE05.2030609@postgresql.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <473DBE05.2030609@postgresql.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)

I'd prefer we not get into a flamewar over this, all, but I'm a little
concerned about this:

On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 03:57:57PM +0000, Dave Page wrote:
> - The general Open Source community's annoyance at MySQL GPL'ing their 
> drivers precisely because they want people to pay for the non-GPL licence.

I think the complaint there is the dual licence stuff, and not the GPL as
such (at least, I'd hope so, since otherwise there'd be a similar objection
to the linux kernel licence, and there doesn't seem to be).  I don't see on
the ODBCng pages any suggestion of a second licence.  Is there?

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
Old sigs will return after re-constitution of blue smoke