Received: from localhost (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54676475D64
	for <pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org>;
	Sun, 17 Nov 2002 20:22:11 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (unknown [192.204.191.242])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CE71475A1E
	for <pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org>;
	Sun, 17 Nov 2002 20:22:10 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id gAI1MBhR021158;
	Sun, 17 Nov 2002 20:22:11 -0500 (EST)
To: Ian Barwick <barwick@gmx.net>
Cc: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: DBD::Pg and 7.3: status? 
In-reply-to: <200211171744.34354.barwick@gmx.net> 
References: <200211171744.34354.barwick@gmx.net>
Comments: In-reply-to Ian Barwick <barwick@gmx.net>
	message dated "Sun, 17 Nov 2002 17:44:34 +0100"
Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 20:22:11 -0500
Message-ID: <21157.1037582531@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS new-20020517
X-Archive-Number: 200211/40
X-Sequence-Number: 3288

Ian Barwick <barwick@gmx.net> writes:
> Can anyone tell me:
> - what is DBD::Pg's current status?

It needs people to work on it.  The former maintainer resigned, so
there's a bit of a vacuum now :-(

> - Err, can I join in ?

Step right up ...

			regards, tom lane