X-Original-To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org Received: from spampd.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D65ED475C15 for ; Tue, 1 Apr 2003 18:50:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (unknown [192.204.191.242]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E987475AF8 for ; Tue, 1 Apr 2003 18:50:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h31NoY2L002152; Tue, 1 Apr 2003 18:50:34 -0500 (EST) To: Bruce Badger Cc: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org Subject: Re: The new FE/BE protocol In-reply-to: <1049238262.1568.9.camel@alice> References: <1049238262.1568.9.camel@alice> Comments: In-reply-to Bruce Badger message dated "02 Apr 2003 09:04:21 +1000" Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2003 18:50:33 -0500 Message-ID: <2151.1049241033@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-31.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_10,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT, REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES autolearn=ham version=2.50 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.50 (1.173-2003-02-20-exp) X-Archive-Number: 200304/8 X-Sequence-Number: 3947 Bruce Badger writes: > Where will the new protocol be documented (& will documentation precede > coding?)? I'd like to have a revised protocol spec out within the next few days --- but it'd be subject to change as the implementation proceeds. > At what point should I start making dev-builds of PostgreSQL to test out > the new protocol? Probably not much point until the protocol changes are all implemented, which'd be, say, late this month. regards, tom lane