X-Original-To: pgsql-interfaces-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF38B11F644A
	for <pgsql-interfaces-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Wed, 29 Mar 2006 13:16:19 -0400 (AST)
Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 65981-01
	for <pgsql-interfaces-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Wed, 29 Mar 2006 13:16:17 -0400 (AST)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 400D311F6376
	for <pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org>;
	Wed, 29 Mar 2006 13:16:17 -0400 (AST)
Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k2THFuv8022966;
	Wed, 29 Mar 2006 12:15:56 -0500 (EST)
To: Keary Suska <hierophant@pcisys.net>
cc: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Libpq and PGConn 
In-reply-to: <C0500A10.279F6%hierophant@pcisys.net> 
References: <C0500A10.279F6%hierophant@pcisys.net>
Comments: In-reply-to Keary Suska <hierophant@pcisys.net>
	message dated "Wed, 29 Mar 2006 09:55:28 -0700"
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 12:15:56 -0500
Message-ID: <22965.1143652556@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.114 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.114]
X-Spam-Score: 0.114
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 200603/28
X-Sequence-Number: 6084

Keary Suska <hierophant@pcisys.net> writes:
> What happens if a null pointer is sent to any libpq function for the PGConn
> parameter?

AFAIR they all check for that and fail in a reasonably clean fashion.
Have you found one that doesn't?

			regards, tom lane