Received: from sss.sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [206.210.65.6]) by hub.org
	(8.8.8/8.7.5) with ESMTP id MAA11844;
	Sun, 5 Jul 1998 12:06:02 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sss.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.sss.pgh.pa.us (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA23080;
	Sun, 5 Jul 1998 12:05:56 -0400 (EDT)
To: Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>
cc: pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org, pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Revised proposal for libpq and FE/BE protocol changes 
In-reply-to: Your message of Sat, 4 Jul 1998 20:05:25 -0400 (EDT)
	<199807050005.UAA06497@candle.pha.pa.us>
Date: Sun, 05 Jul 1998 12:05:55 -0400
Message-ID: <23078.899654755@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Tom, just wondering were we are with this.  Can you update libpq.3?

Will do.  I've been busy with other stuff and have not had time to spend
on pgsql, but will try to push it up the priority list.

> Are the sgml sources updated with the protocol changes?

Yes, those are done.  I had been hoping not to have to update libpq.3
manually, that's all...

> Also, are these items completed?  How about our cancel query key?  I
> think it is random/secure enough for our purposes.  Can you make the
> changes, or do you need changes from me?

I haven't looked to see what's been done there --- have you finished an
initial implementation, or is the cancel-via-postmaster-instead-of-OOB
change still just at the talk stage?  I can handle the libpq end of it,
but feel less secure about modifying the postmaster.

			regards, tom lane