X-Original-To: pgsql-interfaces-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (unknown [64.117.224.193])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id C1A4E30EE9F; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 13:22:22 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([64.117.224.193])
	by localhost (svr1.postgresql.org [64.117.224.193]) (amavisd-new,
	port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 24292-07; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 10:22:12 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (unknown [192.204.191.242])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 176A730EEC8; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 10:22:12 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h5GDMCU6002311;
	Mon, 16 Jun 2003 09:22:12 -0400 (EDT)
To: Michael Meskes <meskes@postgresql.org>
Cc: Philip Yarra <philip@utiba.com>, pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: ECPG CVS version problems 
In-reply-to: <20030616060111.GB11200@feivel.fam-meskes.de> 
References: <200303280200.h2S20N218363@candle.pha.pa.us>
	<200306161110.58418.philip@utiba.com>
	<25659.1055731774@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<200306161404.55749.philip@utiba.com>
	<20030616060111.GB11200@feivel.fam-meskes.de>
Comments: In-reply-to Michael Meskes <meskes@postgresql.org>
	message dated "Mon, 16 Jun 2003 08:01:11 +0200"
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 09:22:11 -0400
Message-ID: <2310.1055769731@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Archive-Number: 200306/44
X-Sequence-Number: 4255

Michael Meskes <meskes@postgresql.org> writes:
> I think we still have preproc.c auto-generated from preproc.y in our
> archive, don't we?

It's not in CVS (and shouldn't be IMHO); but it is built during tarball
creation (including nightly snapshots).  So only people who use CVS
directly need to have bison.

			regards, tom lane