Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by developer.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A0962E0033 for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2008 17:50:11 -0300 (ADT) Received: from developer.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 99889-04 for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2008 17:49:56 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by developer.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F28332E0037 for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2008 17:49:58 -0300 (ADT) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m5AKnutN024397; Tue, 10 Jun 2008 16:49:56 -0400 (EDT) To: Edward Amsden cc: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org Subject: Re: pqlib large object error In-reply-to: <1213130242.15557.3.camel@dad-desktop2> References: <1213118594.9123.11.camel@dad-desktop2> <21991.1213122593@sss.pgh.pa.us> <1213130242.15557.3.camel@dad-desktop2> Comments: In-reply-to Edward Amsden message dated "Tue, 10 Jun 2008 16:37:22 -0400" Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 16:49:56 -0400 Message-ID: <24396.1213130996@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200806/4 X-Sequence-Number: 6747 Edward Amsden writes: > On Tue, 2008-06-10 at 14:29 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> Edward Amsden writes: >>> I cannot seem to figure this error message out: >>> >>> ERROR: duplicate key value violates unique constraint "pg_largeobject_loid_pn_index" >> >> Huh, that shouldn't happen. Is it repeatable? > Yes. It happens every time the program runs, no matter what db or user, > tried unix socket and tcp connect >> What PG version >> is your server? > 8.3.1, running on Ubuntu Linux Hmph. The only thing I can think of is that that index is corrupt, but it seems unlikely that it would be so in all databases. What happens if you REINDEX pg_largeobject? regards, tom lane