Received: from localhost (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id CA3F6475EF7; Tue, 10 Dec 2002 10:48:05 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (unknown [192.204.191.242])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 187B3475B99; Tue, 10 Dec 2002 10:48:05 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id gBAFm4pd026090;
	Tue, 10 Dec 2002 10:48:04 -0500 (EST)
To: Ian Barwick <barwick@gmx.net>
Cc: dbi-dev@perl.org, pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org,
	pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Patch for DBD::Pg pg_relcheck problem 
In-reply-to: <200212101638.03642.barwick@gmx.net> 
References: <200212091631.00125.barwick@gmx.net>
	<200212100034.31936.barwick@gmx.net>
	<20819.1039477650@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<200212101638.03642.barwick@gmx.net>
Comments: In-reply-to Ian Barwick <barwick@gmx.net>
	message dated "Tue, 10 Dec 2002 16:38:03 +0100"
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 10:48:04 -0500
Message-ID: <26089.1039535284@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS new-20020517
X-Archive-Number: 200212/585
X-Sequence-Number: 33040

Ian Barwick <barwick@gmx.net> writes:
> Sounds good to me. Is it on the todo-list? (Couldn't see it there).

Probably not; Bruce for some reason has resisted listing protocol change
desires as an identifiable TODO category.  There are a couple of threads
in the pghackers archives over the last year or so that discuss the
different things we want to do, though.  (Improving the error-reporting
framework and fixing the COPY protocol are a couple of biggies I can
recall offhand.)

			regards, tom lane