Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [209.114.132.154])
	by hub.org (8.10.1/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e9O1vuO83398;
	Mon, 23 Oct 2000 21:57:56 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us)
Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id e9O1vl526096;
	Mon, 23 Oct 2000 21:57:47 -0400 (EDT)
To: Peter Mount <petermount@maidstone.gov.uk>
cc: pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org, pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org
Subject: JDBC now needs updates for large objects
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2000 21:57:47 -0400
Message-ID: <26093.972352667@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Archive-Number: 200010/946
X-Sequence-Number: 7988

Peter,

  As of current sources, large objects no longer occupy tables named
'xinvNNNN' nor indexes named 'xinxNNNN'.  Therefore, it'd be appropriate
to remove the special tests that exclude tables/indices named that way
from the tests in DatabaseMetaData.java.  I have not done this because
I'm not in a position to test changes to the JDBC driver; would you
please add it to your todo list?

			regards, tom lane