X-Original-To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org Received: from spampd.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDB7F475AA9 for ; Mon, 31 Mar 2003 22:48:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (unknown [192.204.191.242]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 387BC47580B for ; Mon, 31 Mar 2003 22:48:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h313mp2L027773; Mon, 31 Mar 2003 22:48:52 -0500 (EST) To: John Huttley Cc: "pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org" Subject: Re: Oracle Porting, Compiere In-reply-to: <1049149006.891.4.camel@fileserver.mwk.co.nz> References: <1049149006.891.4.camel@fileserver.mwk.co.nz> Comments: In-reply-to John Huttley message dated "01 Apr 2003 10:16:46 +1200" Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 22:48:51 -0500 Message-ID: <27772.1049168931@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-29.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_01,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,REFERENCES, REPLY_WITH_QUOTES autolearn=ham version=2.50 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.50 (1.173-2003-02-20-exp) X-Archive-Number: 200303/189 X-Sequence-Number: 3938 John Huttley writes: > For those interested in porting from Oracle to PG, refer > http://www.compiere.org/technology/pg/index.html I can't see any indication of the date this was written --- but I get the feeling it dates back a bit. At least some of the issues mentioned have been solved in recent PG releases. regards, tom lane