Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [209.114.132.154])
	by mail.postgresql.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f2CHIox36324
	for <pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org>;
	Mon, 12 Mar 2001 12:18:50 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us)
Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f2CHIet28068;
	Mon, 12 Mar 2001 12:18:40 -0500 (EST)
To: "J. T. Vermeulen" <jtv@cistron-office.nl>
cc: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: libpq++: combined patches based on 7.1b5 
In-reply-to: <20010312173756.S686@cistron.nl> 
References: <20010312173756.S686@cistron.nl>
Comments: In-reply-to "J. T. Vermeulen" <jtv@cistron-office.nl>
	message dated "Mon, 12 Mar 2001 17:37:56 +0100"
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 12:18:40 -0500
Message-ID: <28065.984417520@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Archive-Number: 200103/93
X-Sequence-Number: 1254

"J. T. Vermeulen" <jtv@cistron-office.nl> writes:
> Here's a version of my suggested diffs transplanted to 7.1 beta 5.
> I'm still looking at the best way to integrate Tom Vijlbrief's fixes
> (insofar as they're still needed); would 7.2 be a suitable time for
> incompatible API changes?

Yes.  It's too late in the 7.1 cycle for anything except bug fixes,
though (and even there, probably only critical fixes...)

			regards, tom lane