Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [209.114.132.154]) by mail.postgresql.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f1NGEwx57237 for ; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 11:14:58 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f1NGEq928263; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 11:14:52 -0500 (EST) To: Lonnie Cumberland cc: Neil Conway , pgsql-general@postgresql.org Subject: Re: www-sql question In-reply-to: <20010222202538.40073.qmail@web12501.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20010222202538.40073.qmail@web12501.mail.yahoo.com> Comments: In-reply-to Lonnie Cumberland message dated "Thu, 22 Feb 2001 12:25:38 -0800" Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 11:14:52 -0500 Message-ID: <28260.982944892@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Archive-Number: 200102/1190 X-Sequence-Number: 5121 Lonnie Cumberland writes: > The problem is that I am not getting any error messages and it is not > returning any data from the database. > It appears that there has been some changes in the way that things are being > done since the last www-sql version had been released. I pulled down www-sql-0.5.7 and took a very quick look at its pgsql.c module, and didn't see any obvious silliness. I don't have time to try to run a real test though. Try running the postmaster with -d2 (and without -S) so that queries are logged in the postmaster log, and then look to see what queries are being received from the www-sql client. BTW, you are running www-sql with a recent libpq library compiled into it, no? regards, tom lane