Received: from thing.verysmall.org (thing.verysmall.org [212.100.226.116]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E7C5C4759F2 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 11:48:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 4567 invoked from network); 10 Jul 2002 16:49:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO verysmall.org) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 10 Jul 2002 16:49:31 -0000 Received: from 62.47.142.12 (proxying for 192.168.84.229) (SquirrelMail authenticated user iavor.raytchev@verysmall.org) by tools.verysmall.org with HTTP; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 18:49:31 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <2885.62.47.142.12.1026319771.squirrel@tools.verysmall.org> Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 18:49:31 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: [pgaccess-users] RE: [HACKERS] bugzilla.pgaccess.org From: "Iavor Raytchev" To: In-Reply-To: References: X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Cc: , , , , , , X-Mailer: SquirrelMail (version 1.2.6) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archive-Number: 200207/43 X-Sequence-Number: 2852 Josh Berkus said: > Iavor, > >> Any other suggestions? > > I can tell you from experience that Double-Choco-Latte, another > PHP/PostgreSQL tool, is really set up just for single projects. So it > would work fine for PGAccess-only. However, DCL has its own problems > and is not necessarily better than Mozilla; I personally don't think > it's worth switching tools just to eat our own dogfood if we don't gain > some functionality in the process. > > I'd love to re-write one of these tools someday; they all have ghastly > UI problems. Right. Just after I do the accounting program, and get > caught up on my tax filing, and re-paint the bathroom ... Thanks, Josh. This was the answer I wanted to hear. > The one thing that really "bugs" me about Mozilla/Issuezilla is that, > if you click the link on an issue e-mail, you don't get automatically > logged in, forcing you to search for the bug a second time if you want > to commment or close the issue. Grrr. Also there's no option *not* to > get the darned e-mails for people who check the web interface > regularly. What don't you try bugzilla.bugzilla.org or something like that :) I mean - the guys at Mozilla have made a great product using Bugzilla. I would be happy if we bring pgaccess at least to the level of Mozilla. Then we can talk about changing the bug tracking system. Agreed?