Received: from smtp.pacifier.com (asteroid.pacifier.com [199.2.117.154])
	by hub.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA51004;
	Tue, 2 May 2000 12:39:37 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from dhogaza@pacifier.com)
Received: from desktop (dsl-dhogaza.pacifier.net [207.202.226.68])
	by smtp.pacifier.com (8.9.3/8.9.3pop) with SMTP id JAA26919;
	Tue, 2 May 2000 09:38:11 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <3.0.1.32.20000502092307.01428c80@mail.pacifier.com>
X-Sender: dhogaza@mail.pacifier.com
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.1 (32)
Date: Tue, 02 May 2000 09:23:07 -0700
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>,
 Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>
From: Don Baccus <dhogaza@pacifier.com>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status 
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>,
	Peter Mount <petermount@it.maidstone.gov.uk>,
	Lamar Owen <lamar.owen@wgcr.org>,
	PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>,
	PostgreSQL-interfaces <pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org>,
	"Peter Mount (Home)" <peter@retep.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <4100.957283324@sss.pgh.pa.us>
References: <390EB8E2.6EE3D2DA@alumni.caltech.edu>
	<200005021102.HAA08318@candle.pha.pa.us>
	<390EB8E2.6EE3D2DA@alumni.caltech.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Archive-Number: 200005/34

At 12:02 PM 5/2/00 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:

>Relevant question: how well does the JDBC code that's in CVS now
>work with 7.0?  If the answer is "hardly at all" then a new driver
>is probably better even if it has lurking bugs.  If the answer is
>"pretty well" then again I'd be inclined to ship what we've got.

One of our OpenACS (until recently ACS/pg) crew has gotten the
ArsDigita webmail software running with PG7.0 and JDBC, apparently
without problems.

I don't know which beta he's running, though...



- Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza@pacifier.com>
  Nature photos, on-line guides, Pacific Northwest
  Rare Bird Alert Service and other goodies at
  http://donb.photo.net.