Received: from sid.trust.ee (root@sid.trust.ee [194.204.23.180]) by hub.org (8.8.8/8.7.5) with ESMTP id GAA26966 for ; Sat, 18 Apr 1998 06:31:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sid.trust.ee (wink.trust.ee [194.204.23.184]) by sid.trust.ee (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA06648; Sat, 18 Apr 1998 13:30:48 +0300 Message-ID: <3538815C.AB4754C2@sid.trust.ee> Date: Sat, 18 Apr 1998 13:33:00 +0300 From: Hannu Krosing X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.05 [en] (Win95; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: The Hermit Hacker CC: Byron Nikolaidis , pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Naming of the PostreSQL ODBC .dll file References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit The Hermit Hacker wrote: > > On Fri, 17 Apr 1998, Byron Nikolaidis wrote: > > > Julia, > > > > That was one of the biggest changes with this driver. It no longer supports > > 16 bit windows. All the messy Dummy Handle Lists that used to be mainted were > > eliminated and now the handle is the pointer to the structure for all the > > Statement functions. The old driver used GlobalAlloc and GlobalLock to handle > > 16 bit because the pointer returned by malloc may be moved and is not > > sufficient to be used for a handle. In 32 bit windows, you can safely use > > malloc. > > > > Our web site explains this. > > > > I sure hope this driver doesn't have to support 16 bit! > > Hrmmm...just curious, but how many users were lost because of > *this* decision?? Doesn't this sort of assume that *everyone* is running > Win95 or greater? None, if *this* decision has anything to do with the better quality of the current driver. I guess that one working 32 bit driver gets us more users than largely broken ones for both 32 and 16. It may be a good idea to keep the old 16 bit driver around, but I can't see anyone motivated enough to actually do it ;( Hannu