Received: from golem.jpl.nasa.gov (root@hectic-1.jpl.nasa.gov [128.149.68.203]) by hub.org (8.8.8/8.7.5) with ESMTP id JAA18665 for ; Wed, 29 Apr 1998 09:56:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from alumni.caltech.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by golem.jpl.nasa.gov (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA32651 for ; Wed, 29 Apr 1998 13:59:30 GMT Sender: tgl@mythos.jpl.nasa.gov Message-ID: <35473241.A136AA91@alumni.caltech.edu> Date: Wed, 29 Apr 1998 13:59:29 +0000 From: "Thomas G. Lockhart" Organization: Caltech/JPL X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.03 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.0.30 i686) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Postgres Hackers List Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Access'97 and ODBC References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > "For Postgres v6.3 (and earlier) the default date/time style is > "traditional Postgres". In future releases, the default may become > ISO-8601, which alleviates date specification ambiguities and Y2K > collation problems." > > I vote for changing default date format to ISO-8601 to reflect > PostgreSQL documentation and for adherence to Standard SQL92. I was thinking that if the default format changes it should change at a major rev (i.e. v7.0) since one might expect interfaces to need updates at a major rev anyway. But let me turn around the question, in case no one is bothered by this: Does anyone think that the default date format _shouldn't_ change to ISO-8601 for the next release? (I expect to hear that it shouldn't change, but figured I should confirm it...). - Tom