Message-Id: <35A4C8CE.3A7A43BC@insightdist.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 1998 09:42:38 -0400
From: David Hartwig <daveh@insightdist.com>
Organization: Insight Distribution Systems
Mime-Version: 1.0
To: "Thomas G. Lockhart" <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>
Cc: Postgres Hackers List <hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] Access & Postgres
References: <35A133DB.CFE63868@insightdist.com> <17439.980708@bo.nettuno.it>
	<35A397BC.227963C7@insightdist.com>
	<35A44BC2.2BD59A30@alumni.caltech.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Tom,

Yes, I do have access to the cvs tree from home.   And, I will check it out
when I get home.

I am curious though.   Did you apply the patch, mentioned below, to your
latest 6.4 tree?    This patch should have been already part of the latest
6.4.   And, to my knowledge, it was already applied completely and
successfully.

Anyway,  the intent of the patch on our web site was to allow 6.3 users to
be able to use MS Access cleanly.   Now that I think of it, though, this
version of the patch does not include the new "output" and "sql"  files
necessary for the regression test.   In any case, I should clean that up.


Thomas G. Lockhart wrote:

> > http://www.insightdist.com/psqlodbc/junkfilter_patch.txt
> > I know the code works.
>
> Hi David. Do you have access to the latest cvs development tree for
> Postgres? I'm seeing backend crashes from the "junkfilter" regression
> test, and have been for some time. I (just this morning) applied some
> patches to the tree to fix up type coersion for inserts from other
> tables or columns, and this changed code in the "junkfilter" area.
> However, the regression test behavior is still bad.
>
> If you have access to the latest tree, and had time to look at this it
> would be great. Otherwise, I'll start poking at it. Talk to you soon...
>
>                    - Tom