Received: from u1.abs.net (root@u1.abs.net [207.114.0.131]) by hub.org (8.8.8/8.7.5) with ESMTP id QAA00575 for ; Mon, 10 Aug 1998 16:37:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: from insightdist.com (nobody@localhost) by u1.abs.net (8.9.0/8.9.0) with UUCP id QAA27628 for pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org; Mon, 10 Aug 1998 16:30:02 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: u1.abs.net: nobody set sender to insightdist.com!daveh using -f Received: from ceodev by insightdist.com (AIX 3.2/UCB 5.64/4.03) id AA22706; Mon, 10 Aug 1998 16:17:00 -0400 Received: from daveh by ceodev (AIX 4.1/UCB 5.64/4.03) id AA41112; Mon, 10 Aug 1998 16:17:00 -0400 Message-Id: <35CF5659.668650F2@insightdist.com> Date: Mon, 10 Aug 1998 16:21:46 -0400 From: David Hartwig Organization: Insight Distribution Systems X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.05 [en] (Win95; I) Mime-Version: 1.0 To: Matthew Hagerty Cc: pgsql-interfaces Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] postgresODBC and Symantec dbAnywhere/Visual Cafe, broken? References: <3.0.1.32.19980807231935.00693e28@wolfepub.com> <3.0.1.32.19980810112028.006b893c@wolfepub.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Matthew Hagerty wrote: > David, > > That worked... I'm not sure how usefull it will be though. Now when I > select the "plus" next to the contacts table, it lists the fields like this: > > 4 > INTEGER > 15 > -blank- > 0 > 0 > 0 > -blank- > -blank- > -blank- > -blank- > This may be a bug in the driver. Every once and a while when we throw a new application a the driver we find some imperfections in its implementation. This is our first attempt at dbAnywhere. I am sure we can straighten this out, but we are backed up right now. > When I select one of these items, all its properties are ghosted out. Then > again, I'm not sure how it would look with say, Oracle or some other > database. Do these RAD tools really increase a programmers development > time, or just change what he/she spends most of his/her time working on? > Visual Cafe and JBuilder seem like a large amount of money to only be able > to paint the GUI, or are biased to large RDBMSes that cost mega bucks and > only run on UN*X systems that cost just as much. What are you using for > RAD Java apps? Much of what you are experiencing is one time start-up cost. For you this is a new database and a new IDE. For us, this is the first time with dbAnywhere. These problems will work themselves out; future dbAnywhere users will hopefully benefit from your experience. To your question "What are you using for RAD Java apps?" VB5 :-)