Received: from u1.abs.net (root@u1.abs.net [207.114.0.131]) by hub.org (8.8.8/8.7.5) with ESMTP id KAA29206 for ; Wed, 26 Aug 1998 10:13:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from insightdist.com (nobody@localhost) by u1.abs.net (8.9.0/8.9.0) with UUCP id JAA27495 for pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org; Wed, 26 Aug 1998 09:46:35 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: u1.abs.net: nobody set sender to insightdist.com!byronn using -f Received: from ceodev by insightdist.com (AIX 3.2/UCB 5.64/4.03) id AA36864; Wed, 26 Aug 1998 09:34:30 -0400 Received: from ppp0_ceodev by ceodev (AIX 4.1/UCB 5.64/4.03) id AA40414; Wed, 26 Aug 1998 09:34:28 -0400 Message-Id: <35E40CAC.FBA3F8EB@insightdist.com> Date: Wed, 26 Aug 1998 09:25:00 -0400 From: Byron Nikolaidis X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.05 [en] (Win95; I) Mime-Version: 1.0 To: Gerald Gryschuk Cc: "Thomas G. Lockhart" , Postgres Interfaces Mailing List Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] iodbc interface on Unix References: <35D99896.DFB21123@alumni.caltech.edu> <35D9D132.4DE6ACB8@insightdist.com> <86iujpr0qh.fsf@avd.gcom.ru> <35DAD65D.34165A2F@insightdist.com> <35DAE850.93FC000C@alumni.caltech.edu> <35DB06BB.16F5D38D@alumni.caltech.edu> <35DB1A0A.53F5BD81@insightdist.com> <35DB2F55.CF1072DA@scf.sk.ca> <35DB3107.894B0E3C@insightdist.com> <35DD97AF.30F23F27@alumni.caltech.edu> <35DDA3D3.D39F5846@insightdist.com> <35DE2B1C.8F52CF5E@alumni.caltech.edu> <35E178DC.137ED18@insightdist.com> <35E2270F.40C138DD@alumni.caltech.edu> <35E3320C.5447BCD9@scf.sk.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Gerald Gryschuk wrote: > Thomas G. Lockhart wrote: > > So, I just finished removing the stubs and internal calls which I had > > added in (having now found the linker options which make sure things > > resolve within the library), when I found some additional stubs which > > are in results.c. They have been there since before I touched the code. > > Are they required for Windows? If so, why aren't the other routines > > required to be stubbed as they were on my Unix box without the right > > linker options?? > > With the "-Bsymbolic" flag(which I found only after you mentioned it) > than none of > these _SQL stubs are needed. Byron only added the _SQL stubs when I told > him that > there was a problem that I thought was related to an ODBC spec issue > which was really > just this problem all along. In other words my ignorance led me to a > mistaken conclusion, which we have attempted to fix in the wrong way > ever since. I really must apologize. > > So I'm positive its o.k. if you dust all references to _SQL functions. > This -Bsymbolic option is great news! Yes, indeed, go ahead and dust the _SQL stubs in results.c! Byron (minus one pair of tonsils)