Received: from golem.jpl.nasa.gov (root@hectic-1.jpl.nasa.gov
 [128.149.68.203])
	by hub.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id CAA22700
	for <pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org>;
	Mon, 5 Oct 1998 02:04:27 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu)
Received: from alumni.caltech.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by golem.jpl.nasa.gov (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id GAA14011;
	Mon, 5 Oct 1998 06:05:17 GMT
Sender: tgl@mythos.jpl.nasa.gov
Message-ID: <3618619C.37CD20A3@alumni.caltech.edu>
Date: Mon, 05 Oct 1998 06:05:16 +0000
From: "Thomas G. Lockhart" <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>
Organization: Caltech/JPL
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.05 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.0.30 i686)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Gerald Gryschuk <gerald.gryschuk@home.com>
CC: Byron Nikolaidis <byronn@insightdist.com>,
	pgsql-interfaces <pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org>
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Re: Just some unfinished stuff.
References: <360C90C5.7A466671@home.com>
 <3614F5A4.CF727893@alumni.caltech.edu>
	<3615D9C9.6070C017@home.com> <36162DEE.F5E25B4B@alumni.caltech.edu>
	<3617E1CC.CF99365@home.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

> > OK, I've gotten your e-mails, and so now I understand where we are
> > starting from (maybe :). v6.3 had some brain-damage on the automatic
> > platform detection (or didn't try at all).
> I tried this new configure.in and it works the way I expected.

OK, I went back and re-read your e-mails. I'd missed the details of the
one which described the changes I should put in to the main configure.in
and Makefile.global.in files. So I put those in, and...

Things seem to configure nicely, except that it is still trying to put
the odbc.h file into /usr/local/include rather than my actual Postgres
directory area /opt/postgres/current/include.

I'm not familiar with autoconf, so if you have any ideas let me know.
The alternative is for us to commit this to the cvs tree and let others
have a chance to look at it and make the corrections.

I hate sitting on these patches for any longer. Let me know if you think
I _shouldn't_ commit them to cvs as an "almost ready to go" set of code.
I'll go through and change WINDOWS to WIN32 beforehand.

Comments?

                 - Tom