Received: from golem.jpl.nasa.gov (IDENT:root@hectic-1.jpl.nasa.gov
	[128.149.68.203]) by hub.org (8.9.2/8.9.1) with ESMTP id KAA16092
	for <pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org>;
	Mon, 1 Feb 1999 10:21:25 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu)
Received: from alumni.caltech.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by golem.jpl.nasa.gov (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA13488;
	Mon, 1 Feb 1999 15:21:42 GMT
Sender: tgl@mythos.jpl.nasa.gov
Message-ID: <36B5C685.C2AF418F@alumni.caltech.edu>
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 1999 15:21:41 +0000
From: "Thomas G. Lockhart" <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>
Organization: Caltech/JPL
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.07 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.0.30 i686)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Peter T Mount <peter@retep.org.uk>
CC: Peter Garner <peter_garner@yahoo.com>, webmaster@retep.org.uk,
	pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Re: ResultSet.getDate
References: <Pine.LNX.4.04.9902011344220.3631-100000@maidast.retep.org.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

> I am thinking on re-working the date handling for PostgreSQL 6.5, as 
> I'm still seeing problems with them.

Anything we should consider doing on the server side to help??

                    - Tom