Received: from jupiter.clockworkweb.com (jupiter.clockworkweb.com [195.89.195.1]) by hub.org (8.9.2/8.9.1) with ESMTP id KAA13022 for ; Fri, 29 Jan 1999 10:40:57 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from markh@clockworkweb.com) Received: from techie1.munster (techie1.munster [192.168.0.131]) by jupiter.clockworkweb.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id PAA06176; Fri, 29 Jan 1999 15:40:48 GMT From: markh@clockworkweb.com (Mark Himsley) To: Byron Nikolaidis Cc: pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] varchar() access Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 15:41:39 GMT Keywords: office Organization: Clockwork Web Message-ID: <36b9d55a.1281545334@jupiter.clockworkweb.com> References: <36b4a95d.2361109@jupiter.clockworkweb.com> <36B0B1B0.3C13B9D3@insightdist.com> <36b0fcb9.1568671@jupiter.clockworkweb.com> <36B1CC96.7FF45553@insightdist.com> In-Reply-To: <36B1CC96.7FF45553@insightdist.com> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.5/32.451 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 29 Jan 1999 09:58:30 -0500, you wrote: >Mark Himsley wrote: > >> I thought Postgres had a limit of 8K? That's what it says in the docs... > >Maybe, but the entire statement length also has a limit of 8K! Yes, I see the problem. I have written some code to split my text data into 4K blocks and write them to separate rows for now, but I am very interested in using the large object support when it's there . Thanks for your time. -- Mark Himsley. Technical Director Clockwork Web. +44 171 471 0770 http://www.clockworkweb.com