Received: from neodymium.btinternet.com (neodymium.btinternet.com [194.73.73.83]) by hub.org (8.9.2/8.9.1) with SMTP id FAA66247 for ; Thu, 25 Feb 1999 05:05:44 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from markh@clockworkweb.com) Received: from bedroom.mdsh.local [194.75.255.119] by neodymium.btinternet.com with smtp (Exim 1.70 #1) id 10Fxfz-0004nb-00; Thu, 25 Feb 1999 10:05:51 +0000 From: markh@clockworkweb.com (Mark Himsley) To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] What's that query limit again? Date: Thu, 25 Feb 1999 10:05:34 GMT Keywords: home Organization: Clockwork Web Reply-To: markh@clockworkweb.com Message-ID: <36d51f16.2391843@mail.btinternet.com> References: <4.1.19990225025132.00990d90@mail.venux.net> In-Reply-To: <4.1.19990225025132.00990d90@mail.venux.net> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.5/32.451 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Matthew Hagerty wrote: > The query limit is 8K right? This 8K limit is going to kill Postgres, IMHO. I really like Postgres but I am going to have to move to some other database platform so that I can populate a web site from a database without having to jump through hoops to split text into 4K blocks. > I'm trying to avoid large objects. I don't see the need for them. My opinion is that the backend should hide large objects from the user. It's all spherical objects to me! -- Mark Himsley. Technical Director, Clockwork Web.