Received: from ms11.hinet.net (root@ms11.hinet.net [168.95.4.11]) by hub.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA94974; Thu, 13 May 1999 15:31:11 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jwlo@ms11.hinet.net) Received: from ms11.hinet.net (h70.s18.ts32.hinet.net [163.32.18.70]) by ms11.hinet.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id DAA14608; Fri, 14 May 1999 03:30:59 +0800 (CST) Sender: kevin@ms11.hinet.net Message-ID: <373B282A.AB5F0D2F@ms11.hinet.net> Date: Fri, 14 May 1999 03:29:46 +0800 From: Kevin Lo X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.51 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.2.8-RELEASE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Thomas Lockhart CC: pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org, webmaster@postgreSQL.org, JKraaijeveld@askesis.nl, horak@mmp.plzen-city.cz, fk@akf.dk, hal_snyder@sdsi.com Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Porting Postgres to NT procedures for English version. References: <373ABDDC.AECCB761@ms11.hinet.net> <373AD3BA.2CAE7D9C@alumni.caltech.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Thomas Lockhart wrote: > > I had written procedures regarding porting Postgres to NT for Chinese > > version. > > Because many people sent me emails, they asked me to traslate this doc > > into English, so I have already finished :) > > Would this be an appropriate doc to incorporate into the main Postgres > documentation set, or do you think that it is best left separate, at > least for now? IMO, I think this doc would be incorporated into the main Postgres documentation set. As Dan mentioned, 6.5 supports dynamicly loaded modules, so it is possible to use plpgsql and other modules. What do you think, Dan? > - Thomas -Kevin.