Received: from ms1.uibk.ac.at (ms1.uibk.ac.at [138.232.1.201]) by hub.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA44094; Sun, 13 Jun 1999 18:20:14 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from Georg.Ritter@uibk.ac.at) Received: from uibk.ac.at (zid-dial107.uibk.ac.at [138.232.7.107] Georg.Ritter@uibk.ac.at) by ms1.uibk.ac.at (8.8.5a) with ESMTP id AAA26299; Mon, 14 Jun 1999 00:20:07 +0200 (MDT) Message-ID: <37642917.FED11C6B@uibk.ac.at> Date: Sun, 13 Jun 1999 23:56:39 +0200 From: Georg Ritter X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.51 [en] (WinNT; I) X-Accept-Language: en-GB,de MIME-Version: 1.0 To: pgsql-sql@hub.org, pgsql-interfaces@hub.org Subject: backing up a db, jdbc, SQL syntax, etc... Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello together! I come up with a conglomerat of questions ;-) o What do you think is the best way to backup the data stored in a postgres db? Backing up the whole db-file, doing a dump into ascii files with seperators or whater ever method else? o Is there a maximum number of connections to the backend that could run us into trouble if lot's of users who are connected via jdbc do not close their applets? o Do I have to take any speacial locking mechanism in SQL into account for a high number (~500) of users. I only use SELECTs, UPDATEs, INSERTs and NEXTVALUE from a sequence over jdbc. Problems with caches, memory/connection ...? o Does anyone know how I can throw out (stop) a java applet completly out of the java interpreter in a browser; so that all resources and memory are released. In the moment this only happens when I kill the browser (netscape on linux) Here some Q's which I posted some times ago in the novice-list but where not answered and so are still open (for me, naturally :-) ) o Where is the difference between: SELECT f.title, f.did, d.name FROM dist d, films f WHERE f.did=d.did; and SELECT films.title, films.did, dist.name FROM dist JOIN films USING(did); or a formulation with inner join? Don't the result in the same output? If I'm not mistaken, why do I get a inner join not yet implemented information, would a inner join have to be implemented in a different way in the db-backend? Greetings from Austria, Georg Ritter -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- student at department of physics University of Innsbruck, Austria Georg.Ritter@uibk.ac.at