Received: from sss.sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [209.114.166.2]) by hub.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA82783 for ; Fri, 19 Nov 1999 17:44:59 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) Received: from sss.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.sss.pgh.pa.us (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id RAA03768; Fri, 19 Nov 1999 17:43:22 -0500 (EST) To: "Sergio A. Kessler" cc: Lamar Owen , "pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org" Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] pg_pwd In-reply-to: Your message of Fri, 19 Nov 1999 19:08:59 -0300 <3835CA7B.5D7FF6F3@perio.unlp.edu.ar> Date: Fri, 19 Nov 1999 17:43:22 -0500 Message-ID: <3766.943051402@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane "Sergio A. Kessler" writes: >> See doc/TODO.detail/pg_shadow. > where ? can you post an absolute url ? Sorry, I forgot that the TODO.detail files are not in the 6.5.* distribution (they got added to the CVS repository since 6.5). I'm not sure if they are available separately at the website (Bruce?). I know you could get them by downloading a current snapshot... >>>> and why is world =writable & readable= ? >>>> (hey, everybody, wanna know my passwd ?) >> >> It's not really a security hole because it lives inside a directory >> that's mode 700 (unless you tampered with the default permissions >> setup). > in rh6.1 /var/lib/pgsql is 755 (and no, I haven't changed anything) > can you spell "2_KM_DIAMETER_HOLE" ? In a standard setup, pg_pwd is inside .../pgsql/data which is mode 700. Have the RH guys really blown it this badly? (Lamar?) regards, tom lane