Received: from mtiwmhc01.worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc01.worldnet.att.net
	[204.127.131.36]) by hub.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA32896
	for <pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org>;
	Wed, 16 Jun 1999 19:25:15 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from bfb@att.net)
Received: from att.net ([12.78.212.176]) by mtiwmhc01.worldnet.att.net
	(InterMail v03.02.07.07 118-134) with ESMTP
	id <19990616232443.YFPD12284@att.net>
	for <pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org>;
	Wed, 16 Jun 1999 23:24:43 +0000
Sender: root
Message-ID: <37683239.F92B2575@att.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 1999 19:24:41 -0400
From: Bernie <bfb@att.net>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.51 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.9-19mdk i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: pgsql-interfaces <pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org>
Subject: Does version 6.5 of the JDBC driver support JDBC 2.0?
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Does the pgsql JDBC driver (6.5) support the
JDBC 2.0 API?  I'd like to implement connection
pooling.

If not, are there plans to suppoort JDBC 2.0
in the near future?
 
Thanks
-Bernie