pg.ddx.io pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org mailing list archive
help / color / mirror / Atom feedLatest tree
7+ messages / 3 participants
[nested] [flat]
* Latest tree
@ 1999-09-28 08:39 Ansley, Michael <Michael.Ansley@intec.co.za>
1999-09-28 09:01 ` Re: [HACKERS] Latest tree Vadim Mikheev <vadim@krs.ru>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Ansley, Michael @ 1999-09-28 08:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: pgsql-interfaces; 'pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org' <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Hi, all,
Whoever is doing the SSL stuff:
In postmaster.c, at lines 995, and 1841, there is code that is not wrapped
in the USE_SSL define.
Last night I checked out the latest source, and couldn't get it to compile.
It seems that the function heap_openr() has a new parameter, and there are
calls that have not been updated yet. I was a little hesitant to go adding
stuff, as the new parameter is a LOCKTYPE, and I wouldn't know what locks
are required where, so I just left well alone. Any comments on this? There
is another function which is paired up with it, but I forget the name, which
also has a new parameter, it seems, and also has calls which have not yet
been updated.
MikeA
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [HACKERS] Latest tree
1999-09-28 08:39 Latest tree Ansley, Michael <Michael.Ansley@intec.co.za>
@ 1999-09-28 09:01 ` Vadim Mikheev <vadim@krs.ru>
1999-09-28 09:54 ` Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] Latest tree Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii@sra.co.jp>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Vadim Mikheev @ 1999-09-28 09:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ansley, Michael <Michael.Ansley@intec.co.za>; +Cc: pgsql-interfaces; 'pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org' <pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org>
"Ansley, Michael" wrote:
>
> Hi, all,
>
> Whoever is doing the SSL stuff:
> In postmaster.c, at lines 995, and 1841, there is code that is not wrapped
> in the USE_SSL define.
>
> Last night I checked out the latest source, and couldn't get it to compile.
> It seems that the function heap_openr() has a new parameter, and there are
> calls that have not been updated yet. I was a little hesitant to go adding
> stuff, as the new parameter is a LOCKTYPE, and I wouldn't know what locks
> are required where, so I just left well alone. Any comments on this? There
> is another function which is paired up with it, but I forget the name, which
> also has a new parameter, it seems, and also has calls which have not yet
> been updated.
I fixed all this yesterday while committing my WAL changes...
Vadim
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] Latest tree
1999-09-28 08:39 Latest tree Ansley, Michael <Michael.Ansley@intec.co.za>
1999-09-28 09:01 ` Re: [HACKERS] Latest tree Vadim Mikheev <vadim@krs.ru>
@ 1999-09-28 09:54 ` Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii@sra.co.jp>
1999-09-28 10:51 ` Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] Latest tree Vadim Mikheev <vadim@krs.ru>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Tatsuo Ishii @ 1999-09-28 09:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Vadim Mikheev <vadim@krs.ru>; +Cc: Ansley, Michael <Michael.Ansley@intec.co.za>; pgsql-interfaces; 'pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org' <pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org>
>I fixed all this yesterday while committing my WAL changes...
>
>Vadim
Does this mean that now we can enjoy the WAL?:-)
BTW, your WAL implementation will allow database recovery from log
files by using roll-forward or similar techniques?
--
Tatsuo Ishii
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] Latest tree
1999-09-28 08:39 Latest tree Ansley, Michael <Michael.Ansley@intec.co.za>
1999-09-28 09:01 ` Re: [HACKERS] Latest tree Vadim Mikheev <vadim@krs.ru>
1999-09-28 09:54 ` Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] Latest tree Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii@sra.co.jp>
@ 1999-09-28 10:51 ` Vadim Mikheev <vadim@krs.ru>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Vadim Mikheev @ 1999-09-28 10:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: t-ishii@sra.co.jp; +Cc: Ansley, Michael <Michael.Ansley@intec.co.za>; pgsql-interfaces; 'pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org' <pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org>
Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
>
> >I fixed all this yesterday while committing my WAL changes...
> >
> >Vadim
>
> Does this mean that now we can enjoy the WAL?:-)
No yet :))
>
> BTW, your WAL implementation will allow database recovery from log
> files by using roll-forward or similar techniques?
Yes.
Vadim
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 7+ messages in thread
* RE: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] Latest tree
@ 1999-09-28 10:03 Ansley, Michael <Michael.Ansley@intec.co.za>
1999-09-28 10:50 ` Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] Latest tree Vadim Mikheev <vadim@krs.ru>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Ansley, Michael @ 1999-09-28 10:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 't-ishii@sra.co.jp' <t-ishii@sra.co.jp>; Vadim Mikheev <vadim@krs.ru>; +Cc: pgsql-interfaces; 'pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org' <pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org>
Hi, Vadim,
I had a problem compiling, message:
line: 1379
In function 'CreateCheckPoint'
storage size of 'delay' is unknown
It seems to hooch over the struct timeval. Ideas?
MikeA
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Tatsuo Ishii [mailto:t-ishii@sra.co.jp]
>> Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 1999 11:55 AM
>> To: Vadim Mikheev
>> Cc: Ansley, Michael; 'pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org';
>> 'pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org'
>> Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] Latest tree
>>
>>
>> >I fixed all this yesterday while committing my WAL changes...
>> >
>> >Vadim
>>
>> Does this mean that now we can enjoy the WAL?:-)
>>
>> BTW, your WAL implementation will allow database recovery from log
>> files by using roll-forward or similar techniques?
>> --
>> Tatsuo Ishii
>>
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] Latest tree
1999-09-28 10:03 RE: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] Latest tree Ansley, Michael <Michael.Ansley@intec.co.za>
@ 1999-09-28 10:50 ` Vadim Mikheev <vadim@krs.ru>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Vadim Mikheev @ 1999-09-28 10:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org' <pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org>
"Ansley, Michael" wrote:
>
> Hi, Vadim,
>
> I had a problem compiling, message:
>
> line: 1379
> In function 'CreateCheckPoint'
> storage size of 'delay' is unknown
>
> It seems to hooch over the struct timeval. Ideas?
I don't know why but sys/time.h was not required under FreeBSD :)
Vadim
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 7+ messages in thread
* RE: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] Latest tree
@ 1999-09-28 10:10 Ansley, Michael <Michael.Ansley@intec.co.za>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Ansley, Michael @ 1999-09-28 10:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 't-ishii@sra.co.jp' <t-ishii@sra.co.jp>; 'Vadim Mikheev' <vadim@krs.ru>; +Cc: pgsql-interfaces; 'pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org' <pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org>
Got it. sys/time wasn't #include'd in xlog.c. I probably should have
mentioned the file the last time as well ;-) sorry.
>> Hi, Vadim,
>>
>> I had a problem compiling, message:
>>
>> line: 1379
>> In function 'CreateCheckPoint'
>> storage size of 'delay' is unknown
>>
>> It seems to hooch over the struct timeval. Ideas?
>>
>> MikeA
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Tatsuo Ishii [mailto:t-ishii@sra.co.jp]
>> Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 1999 11:55 AM
>> To: Vadim Mikheev
>> Cc: Ansley, Michael; 'pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org';
>> 'pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org'
>> Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] Latest tree
>>
>>
>> >I fixed all this yesterday while committing my WAL changes...
>> >
>> >Vadim
>>
>> Does this mean that now we can enjoy the WAL?:-)
>>
>> BTW, your WAL implementation will allow database recovery from log
>> files by using roll-forward or similar techniques?
>> --
>> Tatsuo Ishii
>>
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~1999-09-28 10:51 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
1999-09-28 08:39 Latest tree Ansley, Michael <Michael.Ansley@intec.co.za>
1999-09-28 09:01 ` Vadim Mikheev <vadim@krs.ru>
1999-09-28 09:54 ` Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii@sra.co.jp>
1999-09-28 10:51 ` Vadim Mikheev <vadim@krs.ru>
1999-09-28 10:03 RE: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] Latest tree Ansley, Michael <Michael.Ansley@intec.co.za>
1999-09-28 10:50 ` Vadim Mikheev <vadim@krs.ru>
1999-09-28 10:10 RE: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] Latest tree Ansley, Michael <Michael.Ansley@intec.co.za>
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox