Received: from localhost (IDENT:root@hectic-2.jpl.nasa.gov [128.149.68.204]) by hub.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA51240 for ; Mon, 4 Oct 1999 10:34:16 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu) Received: from alumni.caltech.edu (lockhart@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA22605; Mon, 4 Oct 1999 14:33:29 GMT Sender: lockhart@hub.org Message-ID: <37F8BAB9.A9CB41CC@alumni.caltech.edu> Date: Mon, 04 Oct 1999 14:33:29 +0000 From: Thomas Lockhart X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.0.36 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter Mount CC: woho@ieee.org, Tom Lane , pgsql-interfaces@hub.org Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] problems with large-objects References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > We need to add a reference to this in the JDBC docs, as I'm answering > quite a few "bug" reports where LargeObjects are not working. I'll add this in. I'm making slight changes to the markup, but am reminded that *most* of the jdbc doc has not been marked up at all yet. I wasn't sure how to handle the ascii class diagrams, and how stable the doc is. If we go through the trouble of marking it up, can you then make changes to it? Or did the text come from somewhere else, where you maintain the original docos? - Thomas -- Thomas Lockhart lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu South Pasadena, California