Received: from edtnps05.telusplanet.net (edtnps05.telusplanet.net [198.161.157.105]) by hub.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id FAA94872 for ; Sat, 4 Dec 1999 05:15:51 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from brad@linuxcanada.com) Received: from rddrpx23-port-40.agt.net ([161.184.18.115]:20669 "EHLO linuxcanada.com") by smtp2.telusplanet.net with ESMTP id ; Sat, 4 Dec 1999 03:18:50 -0700 Sender: pepers@smtp2.telusplanet.net Message-ID: <3848EBEB.910DE62A@linuxcanada.com> Date: Sat, 04 Dec 1999 03:24:43 -0700 From: Brad Pepers Organization: Linux Canada Inc X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.0.36 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ALPESH KOTHARI CC: pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Speed of Postgres with Java References: <19991204031143.17192.qmail@web1102.mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit ALPESH KOTHARI wrote: > > Hello, > > I am using Postgres-6.5 as my database. I have to > create and query db using Java (with JDBC). I am using > P-III with 128 MB of RAM. > Consider that following data structure is being stored > in db. > (int4,int4,varchar(50),int2,int4) > To store such 1000 data it takes as large as 90 > seconds. I don't have any pre-experience using db. > So, is this much time OK? > I expect someone to comment who have used db with Java > thoroughly. You've turned off auto-commit right and just do one commit at the end? Otherwise its doing a lot of work for each record added. In general when you are doing bulk inserts, you want to turn off some of the database features to gain speed. Make sure auto-commit is off and then post the results. I bet they are *way* faster! -- Brad Pepers Linux Canada Inc. Home of Linux products in Canada! http://www.linuxcanada.com Proud supporter of Cyclades, Red brad@linuxcanada.com Hat, and Caldera.