Received: from hawk.prod.itd.earthlink.net (hawk.prod.itd.earthlink.net [207.217.120.22]) by hub.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA35002 for ; Tue, 18 Jan 2000 08:11:58 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from davidthewise@earthlink.net) Received: from Pinky (ip122.cambridge2.ma.pub-ip.psi.net [38.32.112.122]) by hawk.prod.itd.earthlink.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id FAA25853; Tue, 18 Jan 2000 05:08:42 -0800 (PST) Sender: root@hawk.prod.itd.earthlink.net Message-ID: <38846413.25C2D41@earthlink.net> Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2000 08:01:07 -0500 From: David Conners X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04 (X11; I; Linux 2.0.35 i486) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Constantin Teodorescu CC: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Forms too complex or to large in pgaccess? References: <387F9541.512D18A7@earthlink.net> <20000115224529.A20896@beehive.hoellwarth> <388178DD.7AC4DA8E@flex.ro> <388337D5.211247B0@earthlink.net> <38833B4A.93870A17@flex.ro> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello, Yes, I used the - Scripts::execute "script_name" - to move some of the larger segments of code out of the form and into scripts. Worked like a charm. I also downloaded and installed your new version of pgaccess, pgaccess-98.3.tar.gz I haven't yet tried to save a form that surpassed the 8K record limit (as I now know more about avoiding that situation), It's good to know that I don't need to worry about losing my work should I surpass the 8K limit. Thanks again for your help. David Conners