Received: from bologna.nettuno.it (bologna.nettuno.it [193.43.2.1]) by hub.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA19507 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2000 11:09:23 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jose@sferacarta.com) Received: from proxy.sferacarta.com (sfcabop1.nettuno.it [193.207.10.213]) by bologna.nettuno.it (8.9.3/8.9.3/NETTuno 4.1) with ESMTP id RAA05180; Fri, 11 Feb 2000 17:08:50 +0100 (MET) Received: from rosso.sferacarta.com (sferacarta.com) [10.20.30.5] by proxy.sferacarta.com with esmtp (Exim 2.05 #1 (Debian)) id 12JHBW-0001om-00; Fri, 11 Feb 2000 14:36:38 +0000 Message-ID: <38A41154.6CC13454@sferacarta.com> Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2000 14:40:36 +0100 From: Jose Soares Organization: Sfera Carta X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6 [en] (WinNT; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chandra Wibawa , interfaces Subject: Re: Thank for your Clue - PostgreSQL ODBC References: <001001bf7301$5dec6c00$230039ca@prima.net.id> <38A16AE9.A95E79BF@sferacarta.com> <000d01bf748c$b02c4d00$230039ca@prima.net.id> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------F42F1F8D7ED9319C920C1DCB" --------------F42F1F8D7ED9319C920C1DCB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Chandra Wibawa wrote: > Dear Jose, Our server configuration is :1. Pentium III 500, 256 MB, > SCSI U2W2. SuSE 6.2, PostgreSQL 6.5.3 Our client configuration is :1. > Pentium 133, RAM 40 MB, IDE2. Windows 98, Access 973. ODBC From > Insight > What version of PsqlODBC are you running? You need 6.40.0007. > I remember this behavior the first times we started using > access->PostgreSQL but now I don't remember > why. > Send this mail to interfaces@postgresql.org, there is Byron Nikolaidis > the author of the ODBC driver, he > certanly knows this behavior. > Also take a look at the FAQ: > http://www.insightdist.com/psqlodbc/psqlodbc_faq.html > > Our network is :1. Network Hub 10 Mb I have followed your hints, it > does improve the performance. I have done some testings, retrieving > 3000 records from server to client.I can see the first hundred lines > of the record, but when i scrolled down the MS Access windowit took a > very long time to scroll down (5 minutes). When i tried to scroll to > the last record, i had to waitfor ages, and finally when i pressed > Ctrl-Alt-Del, i saw a message "not responding" on MS Access. Could > you tell me what could be done to overcome this problem ? Could this > be the network, or the client ? Thanks for your help. Regards,Chandra > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: jose > To: Chandra Wibawa > Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2000 20:26 > Subject: Re: Thank for your Clue - PostgreSQL ODBC > > > Chandra Wibawa ha scritto: > > > Thank's Jose, I have succesfully connected my database > > (postgreSQL) to Access 97 on client machine. But I think > > there is still big problem because the link table takes > > takes too much time (maybe around 45 - 60 minutes, even > > not responding).Would you mind give me suggestion to solve > > my problem ? For your information, our configuration :1. > > Processor 133 MHz at client side2. Harddisk 1 GB at client > > side3. RAM 40 MB at client side4. Our LAN speed is 10 Mbps > > Is this your server or client ? > > M$ access is very slow but 45-60 minutes is too much > This seems like a net problem. > Anyway try to tune ODBC drive. > > GO TO Options(Advanced) > Driver: > > check on: > > > > > check off: > > > > > DataSource: > > check on. > > > > I hope this help you. > > Jose' > > -- Jose' Soares Bologna, Italy Jose@sferacarta.com --------------F42F1F8D7ED9319C920C1DCB Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit  

Chandra Wibawa wrote:

 Dear Jose, Our server configuration is :1. Pentium III 500, 256 MB, SCSI U2W2. SuSE 6.2, PostgreSQL 6.5.3 Our client configuration is :1. Pentium 133, RAM 40 MB, IDE2. Windows 98, Access 973. ODBC From Insight 
What version of PsqlODBC are you running? You need 6.40.0007.
I remember this behavior the first times we started using access->PostgreSQL but now I don't remember
why.
Send this mail to interfaces@postgresql.org, there is Byron Nikolaidis the author of the ODBC driver, he
certanly knows this behavior.
Also take a look at the FAQ:  http://www.insightdist.com/psqlodbc/psqlodbc_faq.html
 
 Our network is :1. Network Hub 10 Mb I have followed your hints, it does improve the performance. I have done some testings, retrieving 3000 records from server to client.I can see the first hundred lines of the record, but when i scrolled down the MS Access windowit took a very long time to scroll down (5 minutes). When i tried to scroll to the last record, i had to waitfor ages, and finally when i pressed Ctrl-Alt-Del, i saw  a message "not responding" on MS Access. Could you tell me what could be done to overcome this problem ? Could this be the network, or the client ? Thanks for your help. Regards,Chandra
----- Original Message -----
From: jose
Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2000 20:26
Subject: Re: Thank for your Clue - PostgreSQL ODBC
 

Chandra Wibawa ha scritto:

Thank's Jose, I have succesfully connected my database (postgreSQL) to Access 97 on client machine. But I think there is still big problem because the link table takes takes too much time (maybe around 45 - 60 minutes, even not responding).Would you mind give me suggestion to solve my problem ? For your information, our configuration :1. Processor 133 MHz at client side2. Harddisk 1 GB at client side3. RAM 40 MB at client side4. Our LAN speed is 10 Mbps
Is this your server or client ?

M$ access is very slow but 45-60 minutes is too much
This seems like a net problem.
Anyway try to tune ODBC drive.

GO TO Options(Advanced)
Driver:

check on:
<KSQO>
<Recognize unique indexes>
<Use declare/fetch>

check off:

<CommLog>
<Parse statments>

DataSource:

check on.
<Row versioning>
 

I hope this help you.

Jose'
 

--
Jose' Soares
Bologna, Italy                     Jose@sferacarta.com
  --------------F42F1F8D7ED9319C920C1DCB--