pg.ddx.io pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org mailing list archive
help / color / mirror / Atom feedDELETEs with jdbc
4+ messages / 2 participants
[nested] [flat]
* DELETEs with jdbc
@ 2000-02-14 21:45 Joseph Shraibman <jks@p1.selectacast.net>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Joseph Shraibman @ 2000-02-14 21:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: pgsql-interfaces
Has anyone noticed DELETEs executed with the jdbc drivers returning 1
even though they delteded 0 rows?
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 4+ messages in thread
* RE: [INTERFACES] DELETEs with jdbc
@ 2000-02-15 09:43 Peter Mount <petermount@it.maidstone.gov.uk>
2000-02-16 03:26 ` Re: [INTERFACES] DELETEs with jdbc Joseph Shraibman <jks@p1.selectacast.net>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Peter Mount @ 2000-02-15 09:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'Joseph Shraibman' <jks@p1.selectacast.net>; pgsql-interfaces
I remember this was fixed in the CVS copy around the time 6.5.3 was
released.
Peter
--
Peter Mount
Enterprise Support
Maidstone Borough Council
Any views stated are my own, and not those of Maidstone Borough Council.
-----Original Message-----
From: Joseph Shraibman [mailto:jks@p1.selectacast.net]
Sent: Monday, February 14, 2000 9:46 PM
To: pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org
Subject: [INTERFACES] DELETEs with jdbc
Has anyone noticed DELETEs executed with the jdbc drivers returning 1
even though they delteded 0 rows?
************
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [INTERFACES] DELETEs with jdbc
2000-02-15 09:43 RE: [INTERFACES] DELETEs with jdbc Peter Mount <petermount@it.maidstone.gov.uk>
@ 2000-02-16 03:26 ` Joseph Shraibman <jks@p1.selectacast.net>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Joseph Shraibman @ 2000-02-16 03:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Mount <petermount@it.maidstone.gov.uk>; +Cc: 'Joseph Shraibman' <jks@p1.selectacast.net>; pgsql-interfaces
Peter Mount wrote:
> I remember this was fixed in the CVS copy around the time 6.5.3 was
> released.
>
> Peter
>
> --
Is there an rpm for this last fixed version? Do you know where the fixes
are because I've hacked up my own version of the drivers and still want to
use my modifications.
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 4+ messages in thread
* RE: [INTERFACES] DELETEs with jdbc
@ 2000-02-16 08:28 Peter Mount <petermount@it.maidstone.gov.uk>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Peter Mount @ 2000-02-16 08:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'Joseph Shraibman' <jks@p1.selectacast.net>; Peter Mount <petermount@it.maidstone.gov.uk>; +Cc: pgsql-interfaces
They are all in the CVS repository on postgresql.org.
What modifications do you have? Would they be of use to others, ie:
include in the mainstream driver?
Peter
--
Peter Mount
Enterprise Support
Maidstone Borough Council
Any views stated are my own, and not those of Maidstone Borough Council.
-----Original Message-----
From: Joseph Shraibman [mailto:jks@p1.selectacast.net]
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2000 3:26 AM
To: Peter Mount
Cc: 'Joseph Shraibman'; pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] DELETEs with jdbc
Peter Mount wrote:
> I remember this was fixed in the CVS copy around the time 6.5.3 was
> released.
>
> Peter
>
> --
Is there an rpm for this last fixed version? Do you know where the
fixes
are because I've hacked up my own version of the drivers and still want
to
use my modifications.
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2000-02-16 08:28 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2000-02-14 21:45 DELETEs with jdbc Joseph Shraibman <jks@p1.selectacast.net>
2000-02-15 09:43 RE: [INTERFACES] DELETEs with jdbc Peter Mount <petermount@it.maidstone.gov.uk>
2000-02-16 03:26 ` Joseph Shraibman <jks@p1.selectacast.net>
2000-02-16 08:28 RE: [INTERFACES] DELETEs with jdbc Peter Mount <petermount@it.maidstone.gov.uk>
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox