Received: from localhost (IDENT:root@hectic-1.jpl.nasa.gov [128.149.68.203])
	by hub.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA81356;
	Tue, 2 May 2000 07:13:59 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu)
Received: from alumni.caltech.edu (lockhart@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA08153;
	Tue, 2 May 2000 11:15:46 GMT
Message-ID: <390EB8E2.6EE3D2DA@alumni.caltech.edu>
Date: Tue, 02 May 2000 11:15:46 +0000
From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.0.36 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>,
	Peter Mount <petermount@it.maidstone.gov.uk>
CC: Lamar Owen <lamar.owen@wgcr.org>,
	PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>,
	PostgreSQL-interfaces <pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org>,
	"Peter Mount (Home)" <peter@retep.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status
References: <200005021102.HAA08318@candle.pha.pa.us>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archive-Number: 200005/25

> Not to bug you Peter, but 7.0 may not wait three days before release.

I would vote that this is important enough that it should wait, but no
one has raised the issue until now so we haven't discussed it. The
docs may or may not be completed within the next day (still jet-lagged
from vacation, but waking up at 3am does leave some extra time in the
morning, eh?), and if they stretch an extra day which is certainly
possible then we are only talking about an extra day for this. No big
deal in the grand scheme of things...

Peter, is there some testing that could/should be done with the new
driver (by others) in the meantime, or is it pretty likely to be
reasonably hashed out?

                     - Thomas

-- 
Thomas Lockhart				lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu
South Pasadena, California