Received: from localhost (IDENT:root@hectic-2.jpl.nasa.gov [128.149.68.204]) by hub.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA05773 for ; Thu, 18 May 2000 01:06:07 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu) Received: from alumni.caltech.edu (lockhart@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id FAA28099; Thu, 18 May 2000 05:10:27 GMT Message-ID: <39237B43.C19ACF1A@alumni.caltech.edu> Date: Thu, 18 May 2000 05:10:27 +0000 From: Thomas Lockhart X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.0.36 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: SAKAIDA Masaaki , Lamar Owen CC: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org Subject: Re: pgbash-2.1 released References: <39224A1C258.4F6CSAKAIDA@smtp.psn.ne.jp> <39229EBA.77555E7D@alumni.caltech.edu> <39233D143CA.DF02SAKAIDA@smtp.psn.ne.jp> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archive-Number: 200005/19 > > > Please let me report that pgbash-2.1 was released. > > > (Pgbash is a tool which can execute SQL directly with using all > > > the functions of a bash shell. And Pgbash has functionality > > > which is similar to psql.) > > > * Download Page > > > http://www.psn.co.jp/PostgreSQL/pgbash/download-e.html > > Hello Masaaki. Could we consider packaging pgbash into our postgres > > RPMs for Linux? That would make it available on a *lot* more > > installations, and would be a very nice addition to the RPMs. > Yes, please :-). I'm glad you like it. Lamar, how about it? Packaging it completely separately (as, say, pgbash-2.1-1.i386.rpm) seems to make it hard to match up with other postgres-related RPMs. Does postgresql-pgbash-xxx work, or should we keep it separate? The version number is a problem if we merge it directly into the postgresql rpm set. - Thomas -- Thomas Lockhart lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu South Pasadena, California