Received: from sss.sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [209.114.166.2]) by hub.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA90476 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 1999 11:17:33 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) Received: from sss.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.sss.pgh.pa.us (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAA03947; Wed, 29 Sep 1999 11:15:55 -0400 (EDT) To: "Moray McConnachie" cc: "Tim Joyce" , pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] psql trerminal behaviour In-reply-to: Your message of Wed, 29 Sep 1999 16:09:10 +0100 <015a01bf0a8c$957930f0$760e01a3@oucs.ox.ac.uk> Date: Wed, 29 Sep 1999 11:15:55 -0400 Message-ID: <3945.938618155@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane "Moray McConnachie" writes: > As I understand it, Postgres installation requires you not only to > have readline installed, but to have the readline header-files > installed. Yes; you can hardly build a readline client app from source without 'em. > Many people may have the readline libraries installed, but > not the headers, e.g, under RedHat 6.0, where you would need to > install not only readline-x.y.rpm (installed by default), but > readline-devel-x.y.rpm, which is not installed by default, IIRC. Might > it be worth sticking something like this on the install FAQ? Hmm, good point. I think you are right, this ought to be pointed out somewhere in our docs. (I'd say this is a mispackaging of readline, BTW: installed headers belong with the library, not with the sources. By that logic a non-devel RH system would ship with an empty /usr/include tree and you couldn't compile *anything*. But I doubt RH cares what I think...) regards, tom lane