Received: from mail.phoenixcolor.com (www.phoenixcolor.com [206.102.93.34])
	by hub.org (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id e6KAtOh46230
	for <pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org>;
	Thu, 20 Jul 2000 06:55:24 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from phoenixcolor.com (thor [172.16.0.210])
	by mail.phoenixcolor.com (Pro-8.9.3/Pro-8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA13194
	for <pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org>; Thu, 20 Jul 2000 07:02:18 -0400
Message-ID: <3976D9E8.1854A1B7@phoenixcolor.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2000 06:52:24 -0400
From: John Thorhauer <jthorhauer@phoenixcolor.com>
Organization: Phoenix Color Corporation
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.12-20 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: postgres-inter <pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org>
Subject: large object clean up
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archive-Number: 200007/162

I remember reading somewhere about postgres having problems cleaning up
large objects after they are deleted out of the database.  Is this a
problem in postgres right now?  Can anyone point me to any documenation
on it?

Thanks,
John
-- 
********************************
** John Thorhauer
** jthorhauer@phoenixcolor.com
********************************